“Secret sex and police surveillance in the Tearoom”. Von Katherine Biber in Crime, Media, Culture, Vol. 5, No. 3, 243-267 (2009). (Inhaltsverzeichnis des Dezemberhefts; Bildquelle: William E. Jones)
Abstract: “In 1962, police officers concealed themselves for two weeks in a men’s public toilet in Mansfield, Ohio, and filmed men performing illicit homosexual sex acts. The film footage was used to secure convictions for sodomy, and inaugurated a new form of police surveillance of homosexual public sex. In 2008, the visual artist William E. Jones screened the police footage in art galleries around the world, to both critical acclaim and public objection. This article examines the film, both as a prosecutorial artefact and an artwork, to explore what it says about public sex, police surveillance, the criminalization of homosexual practices, visual evidence, and contemporary art. It considers the validity of the public/private distinction as it applies to anonymous sex, it evaluates the probative value of images, the changing nature of surveillance, and the meanings of silence in both criminal procedure and artistic practice. This article argues that the act of transforming traumatic evidence into visual art requires deep ethical examination. Whatever artistic, political or historical contribution may be claimed for this work must be measured against the harm that it does to the film’s silent subjects”.
Nachtrag: im Rezensionsteil des Hefts bespricht Melisssa Deary Ronnie Lippens and Don Crewe (eds): Existentialist Criminology. London: Routledge Cavendish, 2009. (Google hat eine Voransicht des Buches). Außerdem Ruth Penfold-Mounce Eamonn Carrabine: Crime, Culture and the Media. Cambridge: Polity, 2008. (Wenn ich Herrn Gohlis recht verstehe, dann scheint auch im krimibezogenen Bereich Interesse an den unterschiedlichen Kriminologien zu bestehen: tolle, lege.)
Verwandte Artikel: